Skip to main content

"I think Comic Sans always screams fun."

I have barely skimmed the surface of what I could possibly learn about the process of conducting a research study. There is so much to learn that I feel a little overwhelmed actually. Although I feel overwhelmed, I feel a bit more empowered to attempt to begin a research study. I now feel that I have more resources at my disposal, and I feel more confident in my ability to learn what else I might need to know as I move forward with my research projects.    

While I definitely do not see myself becoming a professional researcher, a lot of what I have done in this class has made me more aware of the possibilities in my field. Additionally, I never knew I would be so obsessed with typeface before this class. Everything I have read in preparation for my research proposal has been absolutely fascinating to me, and I definitely did not see that coming. 

In closing, I think that Comic Sans (and many other typefaces) gets a little bit of a bad rap. While, Comic Sans may be totally ridiculous in certain contexts, every typeface has a place in design. Do I want to see it in technical contexts? No. Would I mind it on my niece's kindergarten newsletter? Absolutely not. 

The thing about being a technical communicator, or a student of rhetoric is learning that every rhetorical situation is different. So, let's not vilify typefaces, ok? There are far more offensive things out there than an inappropriate use of Comic Sans.    

Comments

  1. I agree with you there there is so much to learn about what we have discussed in this class; however, I think this is a great foundation for moving forward. I find it interesting that you don't foresee yourself working as a researcher when I think that would be a great fit for you. I look forward to seeing your presentation. :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Brianna,

    I especially enjoyed seeing your research interests evolve and grow as we dug deeper into the readings this semester! As a scholar in typography, you bring a lot of passion into your project, and having you make connections among sources during class discussion illustrates your valuable contribution to the field. Keep it up and always remember the different research methods (and goals) we discussed in 6401 to lead future TWDR investigations as rooted in sound methodologies.

    Good luck!
    Dr. B

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Yeah, people. Consistent font usage. Come on."

Once, while preparing for a conference presentation, I was advised not to use Helvetica or Times New Roman for my slides. No self-respecting academic would want to be seen in front of slides that used two of today’s most widely used fonts. But why? This piece of advice really stuck with me. Would I actually be looked down on as a lesser academic because I used a commonly used (not to mention, perfectly legible) font? Should not the consistency, reliability, and reputable functionality of a font like Helvetica  add  to my credibility?  Certainly, there are more factors than readability, professionalism, and clarity that go into a user’s assessment of ethos through typeface. Context, conditioning, and tacit criticism are possible answers to the “why?” Why shouldn’t I use Helvetica here, but I should use it there? Why does Helvetica hold the power to both improve and destabilize my document’s credibility?  The way we laypeople select fonts is typically based on some kin...

"Sometimes I'll start a [research project], and I don't even know where it's going. I just hope I find it along the way."

 I wouldn't exactly say I have "revision" plans as much as I would like to say that I have plans to actually write the research design portion of my proposal. I am struggling to pin down exactly how to approach my research questions. I want to gather some quantitative data, but what I am most interested in is the qualitative data. I want answers to the "why" in why people perceive certain typefaces as adding or detracting from a text's credibility.  I didn't think that this was such a huge question until I sat down and actually started thinking about how to find the answer. In preparing my rough draft outline, I had a very vague idea of creating mock pages from a variety of news outlets, but I'm not certain that will be focused enough.  As I continue trying to build/decide on my research plan, I will be working on sizing down my literature review and shaping up the other portions of my proposal (those unrelated to my research methods). For now, I am ...